YouTube Changes the Video Claim Policy After Negative User Feedback

YouTube changes the video claim policy after negative user feedback. YouTube’s computerized Content ID service has lead to wrong takedowns during these months and, for this, the video platform is apologizing.

In an attempt to improve the situation, the giant Google-owned website has assembled a new team of people to address this issue and ease worries from content makers and trademark owners as well. Currently, the website has various forms for material creators whose video clips have been taken to the side because of age restrictions or other policy offenses, like trademark claims.

For enough famous YouTubers who rely on advertising income, an eliminated video represents a dent in their revenues and the procedure to get these video clips reinstated requires a long time. Lately, there have been many debates about the administration of the video platform, from movie takedowns to account demonetization, according to members of YouTube’s policy group.

They want people to understand that the specialists track these takedowns very carefully, and while they did not notice a major improvement in the total percentage of removals, it is true that they do get some things wrong. For that, YouTube is sorry, so they try to perform better for the huge community of users.

Because of negative customer reviews, YouTube is reevaluating its guidelines and might be releasing new projects later this year. This has determined them to create special teams devoted to reducing errors and helping the overall quality of their activities.

It has motivated them to launch some rules in the next weeks that could help enhancing the interaction between content makers and YouTube assistance. An existing feeling in the users’ feedback area is that now it is too simple for a person to undermine content with false copyright claims and that these claims should be proved.

Any snazzy user can claim various video clips without evidence, according to many people. The idea is that the material ID, trademark claims and many more features in YouTube’s service are rather defective.

The incorrect claims are not being penalized for their activities and instead, the users are which is not right. Furthermore, none of the site’s representatives is doing something about the response programs that are not reasonably used.

This has to be set instantly and YouTube must stop depending on a robotic service and require evidence of the claim being stated. Other customers are indicating that YouTube should modify their guidelines in order to give content makers an opportunity to protect their video clips before takedowns and to hire people to do the tracking rather than the current robotized services.

Image source: Actonthis